Methodology Description
Meerkat recordings were conducted on habituated but free-living meerkats at the Kalahari Research Centre, South Africa. Most recordings were conducted while the group was foraging. During this activity, the meerkats move slowly through the landscape while searching for food in the ground. Meerkats vocalize frequently during foraging to maintain group cohesion and during social interactions such as food competition, dominance interactions, pup begging, or antipredator warnings. Some recordings were also focused on individuals who were on sentinel duty, i.e., meerkat is in a standing position and scanning for predators while the rest of the group forages. Each recording is focused on one target individual (i.e., the focal individual). Each recording has two channels: one channel is a directional microphone pointed at the focal animal at a distance of 30-100 cm, and the other channel is a handheld microphone in which the human recordist narrates the ongoing recording. At the start of each recording, the recordist provides a variety of metadata about the recording, including the name of the focal individual, the group name, the date and time, etc (however, the clips you hear may not include this starting annotation). During the recording, the recordist tries to signal each time the focal individual vocalizes by saying the call type and the behavioral context of the call (or simply saying ‘again’ if the information is the same as the last call). As a note, the most common call, the close call, is often abbreviated to “CC” in the human narration. They will also occasionally note the distance and identity of the nearest neighbor (if known) or the behavior of the group in general.
Equipment Used
Individual meerkats were recorded with a Sennheiser directional microphone (ME66, with K6 powering module) connected to Marantz solid-state recorder (PMD661 or PMD670, Japan Inc.; sampling frequency 48 kHz, 16 bits accuracy). Human annotations of meerkat behavior were recorded concurrently on the Marantz recorder on a second channel using a handheld microphone (Joseph E-280 Dynamic Microphone, 40 HzÐ20 kHz, (+/- 2.5 dB)).
References
This is just a small example: Driscoll, I., Briefer, E. F., & Manser, M. B. (2024). The role of neighbour proximity and context on meerkat close call acoustic structure. Animal Behaviour, 212, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.03.021 Manser, M. B. (2001). The acoustic structure of suricates’ alarm calls varies with predator type and the level of response urgency. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 268(1483), 2315–2324. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1773 Manser, M. B., Jansen, D. A. W. A. M., Graw, B., Hollén, L. I., Bousquet, C. A. H., Furrer, R. D., & le Roux, A. (2014). Vocal Complexity in Meerkats and Other Mongoose Species. In Advances in the Study of Behavior (Vol. 46, Issue June, pp. 281–310). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800286-5.00006-7 Rauber, R., & Manser, M. B. (2017). Discrete call types referring to predation risk enhance the efficiency of the meerkat sentinel system. Scientific Reports, 7(44436), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44436 Wyman, M. T., Rivers, P. R., Muller, C., Toni, P., & Manser, M. B. (2017). Adult meerkats modify close call rate in the presence of pups. Current Zoology, 63(3), 349–355. https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zox029